AudioShake
AudioShake is built to speed up one of the slowest parts of audio work—getting to a usable result you can ship. Whether that’s mastering, mixing decisions, cleanup, or stem separation, it’s designed to help you move from “raw” to “ready” faster.
Disclosure
AI Velocity Lab may receive an affiliate commission when you sign up through links on this page. This does not affect our editorial review process.
Velocity Highlights
- Generate high-quality stems without needing original multitracks
- Speed up sync edits by creating instrumentals/vocal-ups quickly
- Turn “read-only” catalog audio into editable stems for new deliverables
- Reduce time spent doing manual separation work that doesn’t scale
- Create alternate mixes and edits faster for licensing and post needs
Pricing
Subject to Change – visit pricing page
| Plan | Price (monthly) |
|---|---|
| AudioShake Indie | Stem packages (4 / 10 / 20 stems) — pricing shown in-product |
| AudioShake Live | Enterprise (contact sales) |
| AudioShake API | Enterprise (contact sales) |
| Enterprise | Contact sales |
Captured from AudioShake sources on 2026-05-14.
Use cases
- Sync edits without multitracks: Create instrumental-only, vocal-up, and alternate versions quickly for licensing workflows.
- Catalog repurposing at scale: Generate stems from back-catalog to create new monetizable assets (stems, alt mixes, remixes).
- Post production separation needs: In certain workflows, separating dialogue/music/effects can make cleanup and rebalance easier (project dependent).
Key features
- High-fidelity stem separation focus: AudioShake competes on separation quality and artifact control for professional use.
- Multiple product tiers (Indie vs Live vs API): Indie is packaged for smaller teams; Live/API are built for scale and integration.
- Workflow-first outputs: Designed to create stems you can actually use for deliverables, not just practice.
Pros & cons
Pros
- Strong reputation for pro-grade separation quality
- Built for real post/sync/catalog workflows
- Multiple tiers for different scales
- Useful when separation needs to be reliable
Cons
- Pricing is not fully transparent on a single public pricing page
- Overkill for casual practice/remix use
- Quality and turnaround depend on tier and content complexity
FAQ
Is AudioShake beginner-friendly?
It can be, especially via Indie, but it’s fundamentally a pro-oriented tool. Casual users may find practice-focused apps simpler.
Will AudioShake replace a pro?
It replaces manual separation labor in many workflows, but you still need human judgment for what stems are usable and how to edit them.
What are the main limitations?
Pricing and some details are often in-product or sales-led. Also, no stem splitter is perfect—dense mixes can still produce bleed/artifacts.
Final verdict
AudioShake is best when stem separation quality is a workflow requirement, not a novelty. If you’re doing sync, post, or catalog work where usable stems unlock deliverables and revenue, it’s one of the top tools to evaluate. For casual practice stems, Moises is usually simpler and cheaper.